Breasts...breasts...breast

Breasts…breasts…breasts

There has got to be a reason that men and women love these two mounds of flesh upon a woman’s chest.  The most common misconception is from being breast fed as an infant. I think not, because not all babies were allowed to partake of the nectar provided by nature. It has also been said that it is envy, wanting what you can’t have without buying them.  Nope, I don’t think that is true either.

Let take a look back to the past and see what we can about breasts.  In the days of great artists, women were drawn nude and with small but perky breast.  Some of the artists wanted to make sure that their vision of women would be in keeping with the norm of the day.  Artist however always added a health posterior to their models. (Junk in the trunk)

Moving ahead to the early 20th century, women were still viewed by men to have thick asses, although they were just leaving the busell behind (pun intended). Then about the roaring twenties the dress of women changed and they were allowed to show more then an ankle. That is when legs became all the rage. Along with legs came the flappers, with little or no restraint on their breast other than a slip (sometimes). Women became freer and more brazen. Moving pictures were now popular and the depiction of sex was something that was considered again, the norm.
     
Then in the late thirties early forties...tada! Big beautiful Breasts became the model that was put on the screen for all to see.

The likes of Roseland Russell, Jane Mansfield, Ms Marylyn the full figure, fully rounded fine, up lift, cleavage, pillowy soft mounds of tempting flesh, just beckoning you to put your hand on them, or just smother your face into the bosoms of total ecstasy (oops back to the question at hand.).  Could it be the way that they move when they are covered and only the tops are prominently protruding above what ever restraints are holding them?  For the women with out the extra enhancements and more then a small hand full, they remind me of water balloons, or Jell-O. There is just no clear cut explanation for what it does to your imagination. Is it the cleavage or what appears to be soft flesh that attracts the eye?  Women have learned to attract your attention to their cleavage by wearing a necklace the points to the valley of heavenly pleasure. Or by wearing blouses that are revealing or so tight that you could see the pours on their chest. Either way, wear what you want to wear as long as you leave something to the imagination.

Okay let us get real. The breasts have one purpose. From previous experience I have enjoyed that purpose eminence. They grow up to 3 time their normal size; they become thicker, heavier and rounder. They make implants seem like sandbag. But alas it is only temporary. They had to revert to what they once were or worse, baggy but more sensitive, than yet not as attractive as before. That is why a lot of women with that extra money and low self-esteem have implants. Make her self more attractive for a man or to boost their image of themselves.

I remember when I was younger, a woman wore vee neck sweater all the time and I fell in pure lust for her cleavage. When I held a conversation with her I was talking to her cleavage, hoping that she would bend over for any reason just to look down her sweater. I know that I am not alone in this because there are website devoted to just that. Therefore I am in good company.

Shape and areola are key to what attracts you before the clothes comes off, her cleavage it the trigger then the skin. Nothing spoils great breasts in my opinion then the so called art of tattooing something silly like a flower, paw prints or the most asinine move yet the name of you current love. Lawd help you if you break up, then you would have to find someone with the same name or spend the mega bucks to have it removed.

Back to shape, we are only talking about natural breast, not the pumped up implants. Not that I don’t like implants but no matter what the possessors of implants say they just don’t move or feel the same. Depending on the way they were implanted the breast may be scared around the areola or underneath the breast. There are some that have their implants placed on top of the existing tissue, which show a layered look when the breasts are hanging as when on your hands and knees. This is not appealing, but is more appealing then the implants under the existing tissue. That is when in the same position as stated before looks like a … oh envision a snowman with only two ball, the big one (implant) and the head ball (the original). The top is gelatin like while the bottom is firm.

You know it is hard to play with nipple that will get hard and does not rise up enough to tweak or nibble; you know what I’m talking about. These nipples are normally found on large breasted women. Few if any women with smaller then 36’s (not based on any evidence just personal experience). Then there are the nipples that stick out no matter what, these are the kind that I enjoy spotting on TV, like Jennifer Aniston on Friends or two of the witches on Charmed, not Pipper, she is a prude. Breast and nipples are the reason Charmed has been on for 8 seasons with a fan base of male 18-39.

Then you have the movement of the breasts… slow motion of a running woman, aw hell, even walking like a lady, the sway from left to right and the up and down motion has an hypnotic affect and control over average red blooded male and the discerning female. Just imagine if she were topless. I know that it’s not healthy for a woman to have her breast bouncing around without a bra on but braless gets my vote.

Some natural breasts are larger than most peoples head. Now they are just as fine as the ones that are "A "cup. Because men have no control over the size of a woman’s breast with exception of the deep pocket man that want to build a woman, men are never satisfied with what they can get or already have.

Breasts are like therapy. Like the stress balls people use to calm their nerves. Don’t take it the wrong way, but there is no better feeling than the hardness of a nipple in the palm of ones hand, surrounded by the pliable smoothness of the breast beneath.

That old idea that the love of breast comes for suckling your mother tit may have merit but what of those that never had their mother’s tit?
Breasts are a phenomenon with not explanation and there never will be, but as for me from itsy bitty tits to Al Bunde’s Big gunns, as long as the come on a real woman be them real or manufactured, I will love them all just the same.

You know the way to shut a man up don’t you?

               Stick something in his mouth.      

                    If you have to could you spare just one?
    

The similarity between Chess and Relationships

Though Chess was invented some time ago (BC), so to were relationships. You could say that it all started with Adam and Eve, the Chess Game of Life.

There are many similarities. You have your King and your Queen, they control the whole shebang. As in chess the King is the target for everyone to go gunning after and the Queen is the most powerful piece. Same as relationships the woman has the power and control to vanquish any piece (man/woman) in her path if she so wishes. I attribute this to the forbidden fruit.

The tree of knowledge, was where the King (man), who started out late in the game, because Eve got a taste of the fruit before Adam giving her a head start on being smarter. It’s like being a twin, you were both born the same day but you came out first and therefore you are the oldest period.

In chess the king is blocked in and has nowhere to move unless given the opportunity. Although the same is true for the queen, once given one space she can run the whole board, she has 8 directions she can go. (Free reign). The poor king can only move one space at a time, unless he can castle (“cheating” to men). See, if a man cheats he gets maybe just maybe one time to ease out of the situation. Than as a rule if you are in check once during the game before you castle, you are not able to castle in the future, ergo… you have lost your cheater’s pass before you even get a chance to use it.

Men use lies (pawns), deception (knights) to advance their game for defense. Men don’t have much of an offense and their defense is some what lacking. It takes a queen to provide the needed offense and defense to protect the (king). The queen on the other hand has her girlz (bishops), home (rooks), but because she is smarter and able to manipulate most any situation, she can turn the knights and the pawns into loyal subjects.

Let me explain a little more clearly. When a man is not living right, his first move it to lie. Although lying is not going to make matters better, they will help to fend off the initial assault on his integrity. He will wipe his brow and know that he just dodged a bullet.

If in fact the pawns don’t work as well as expected, the knights (friends, dawgs, etc) block the way and try to fend off the advancing onslaught. In most cases this defense works for oh…about a…lets say….2% of the time. But it is still a defense that is used.

Women, on the other hand use the same pieces and can cause untold havoc. Queens can lure you in, like a spider. Just when you know you have her right where you want her, you get blindsided by one of her girlz that was laying in the cut and off you go, on to the growing heap of broken bones and twisted flesh of the other failed attempts to conquer the unobtainable queen.

Sometimes the Rook is the most important peace on the board because it only has 2 directions in which to move, the same with the Home. The Queen can make a house a home or just plain HELL. All of which is at her whim.

This is just an overview of the similarities. In relationship as in chess there is but one truth, working together enables you to conquer any obstacle. Use her wisely and maybe you won’t have to lie down in defeat prematurely.